The Mile High Club
|
Posted:Nov 6, 2013 5:51 am
Last Updated:Nov 9, 2013 5:55 am
17739 Views
|
The term “Mile High Club” refers to two people having sex while traveling in an airplane no less than 5,280 feet above the earth. I came across a story on CNN of what can only be described as an ill-fated attempt to join this bucket list club. This attempt went terribly wrong for the two participants, resulting in an arrest and a $250 fine for each of them.
The couple was on their way to of all places, Los Vegas, and omitted the standard trip back to the lavatory. They started up right there in their seat, in a plane filled with young families complete with on-board. Allegedly, they were asked to stop by flight attendants after other passengers complained. The couple still made 2 more follow-up attempts.
For me, membership in the Mile High Club involves a trip to the laboratory, plus penetration while you are a mile in the air; and no I am not a member, yet. Veteran pilots believe you must be at the controls of the plane in order to gain entry into the exclusive club. A cottage industry has cropped up catering to those who would like entry into the Mile High Club. You can board a custom-outfitted aircraft and enjoy your aerial pleasures that way. To me though, that just seems like cheating, since you have no chance of getting caught. For our couple in the story, there were no reports of penetration, just a whole lot of oral.
Are you a member of the Mile High Club? From your prospective, has the couple in our story gained entry into the Mile High Club? They certainly stepped up their game, as far as the potential to get caught, even though penetration didn’t happen. If you feel there must be penetration to get in, does penetration on a custom-outfitted aircraft with no chance of getting caught count? Or do you feel that only those who are the controls of a plane can gain entry into the club?
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
The Perfect Female Body
|
Posted:Oct 30, 2013 8:51 am
Last Updated:May 29, 2014 9:24 pm
18761 Views
|
I stumbled across an article on the net regarding the perfect size of the perfect female body. If you are a baby boomer, you probably grew up with the idea the perfect female body measured 36-24-36. In terms of dress sizes that would be a size 2. The article was commenting on a question raised by a British fashion magazine (Fabulous magazine). The magazine asked both men and women, what size they think the perfect woman should be, and gave them a range of dress waist sizes to choose from. The results certainly surprised me.
In terms of U.S. sizes, the women on average said the perfect size would be a size 6. Now get this, the men on average chose size 10.  WTF, the men preferred women with more cushion of the pushin; and here I was thinking that men are the principal catalyst behind the obsession for women to be thin.
Here are some more peculiar stats. In 2010 the average U.S. woman has a waist size of 30-31 inches, with a dress size of 12-14. Fifty years ago the average woman had a 24-25 inch waist and wore a size 8. Interestingly enough, over roughly the same period of time the average model has gone from a size 8, down to a size 0. Now the majority of the leading ladies fashion designers are men, so you can read into that what you will.
Here is the question: Noting the disconnect between what men and women from the land that gave us Twiggy, see as the perfect female body, does the problem of women having a negative body image come from the fashion industry, Madison Avenue, Hollywood or Barbie, (whose measurements would be 39-21-33, if she was 6 feet tall)? What’s your take on the perfect female body?
|
|
|
7
Comments
|
|
|
|
To the fakers, flakes, no-shows, and picture collectors THANKS
|
Posted:Oct 20, 2013 11:28 am
Last Updated:Feb 3, 2014 1:14 pm
17541 Views
|
Not a day goes by that I don’t read yet another profile or blog were someone is complaining about the fakers, flakes, no-shows and picture collectors. It seems everyone has experienced them; everyone has been frustrated by these individuals. In this on-line forum that we part take in (or any other one for that matter), it’s easy for these individual to toy with us. Things weren’t really any different before the internet and online dating. Way back when the fakers, flakes… etc., just did it face-to-face, faking their background, getting us to spring for drinks, provided fake , or my personal favorite... asked for your number; you know the drill. Men referred to the ladies who did this as cock teasers; I don’t know if there is a name for it when the tables are turned. Ladies you will have to chime in here.
The fakers, flakes, no-show artists, picture collectors, etc., get off on sexual teasing the rest of us. Do a search on “sexual teasing”, what will return in your browser window is lots of links to “how to” guides. No wonder there are some many of them out there. Researchers have found that generally most teasers want to feel attractive and/or desirable. Others want to feel in control, powerful. Some do it to turn themselves on, others do it as a joke or on a dare or bet, so they can have bragging rights with their friends. The reality is they don’t want to have sex with us, but I’m sure, everyone reading this post already knows that. It's almost like we are being use in perpetual virtual random stranger fantasy.  
But you know what, I starting not to mind the fakes. Yes in fact I am starting to think I owe them a degree gratitude. Yes the fakers, flakes, no-shows, picture collectors, etc. are annoying; yes they waste our time; yes they make what we hope to accomplish on this site harder, but they do serve a purpose. The fakers, flakes, no-shows, picture collectors what have you, are the antithesis of what the rest of us seek, making it so much more gratifying when we encounter the real thing.
Pleasure is greatest when juxtaposed against pain and frustration. Yin and yang. So to all my sisters and brother out there looking for the real, keep lusting and may we all find each other. To rest, thank you for your contribution; may karma help you to find each other.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Personal Hygiene Optional?
|
Posted:Oct 14, 2013 8:43 am
Last Updated:Apr 24, 2014 6:13 pm
17650 Views
|
A pet peeve of mine has always been having close interactions with adults, who fail to grasp the importance of maintaining good cleanliness. You would expect adults, especially those on a dating site would be aware of the importance of personal hygiene when going on a play date, so reminders should not be necessary. Sure, if your date is a Porky’s fan, and you are roleplaying a fantasy where she is Kim Cattrall’s character (yummy), Lynn (Lassie) Honeywell, the hot coach of the cheerleaders who gets uncontrollably turned on by the musty body odor smell of the boys locker room, then taking a pass on hygiene that day may be the thing to do. Other than that, NO! I am blogging about this because I keep seeing references in profiles about the need for good hygiene, so it seems a segment of the VisionPersonals.com population is just not getting it.
With the profusion of personal hygiene products available today, you would think personal hygiene issues on play dates would be a non-issue. Personal hygiene products now more than ever, are promoted as products that make you sexier, instead of just cleaner. My assumption is, we all want to be perceived as sexy, so the only possible reason I can think of still making personal hygiene an issue, is that people fail to exercise basic common sense, or somehow people have come to believe the body sprays, colognes, etc., are replacements for basic personal hygiene. Just like sex has some basic moves that can be enhanced, personal hygiene is no different. It still requires the basic minimum daily washing, brushing, rinsing what have you. Granted there is a certain segment of the population who give rise to my pet-peeve, which I have always referred to as the “Hygiene Optional” crowd. If you are a member of the hygiene optional crowd (you know who you are), do you really expect someone to get up close and personal with you, when your stench makes them gag from 5 feet away? So for those of you, who have been neglecting the basics, get with the fu#@$!% program!!
If someone you have fantasied about arrives for your play date smelling and looking a little funky, send them back through the door they came in or through the bathroom door with a bar of soap, a tic-tac and some shampoo (they will get the message). If you choose the bathroom door option, you do leave the option of joining them in there just before they finish up. Hummm…, showers, sex; I’m thinking about Kim Cattrall again… She should be the VisionPersonals.com spokeswoman, or better still a member; handle “SamanthaJones”,
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Music and Sex
|
Posted:Oct 3, 2013 12:48 pm
Last Updated:Jan 26, 2016 5:58 pm
18300 Views
|
I was having a conversation with a friend recently, and the conversation turned to music, which has been a big part of my life. Way back when, I was sought after for my ability to work magic with a 12” (down size queens ..), record. I was a DJ, so using music to put people in the right mood was my thing.
At one time or another, everyone on VisionPersonals.com has probably used music (or at least attempted to use music) to set the stage or to enhance their sexual encounters. With that in mind, I thought I would throw together quick list of songs to set the mood or shake the sheets. The process was not so quick, it is tough to select a concise list, since music for the most part is dedicate to the reason we are all here.
Whenever someone puts together a list like this, there are always a few songs that make the list, depending on your musical tastes. I wanted to stay clear of the usual suspects, because anyone can put together that list. This means no Nine Inch Nails, No Prince; Marvin Gaye is on the list, but no sexual healing; and no 2 Live Crew (uncensored version). Also there are some artist, you could just uses one of their albums and be good; Barry White, TLC, Teddy Pendergrass, Al Green and Luther come to mind. Finally since VisionPersonals.com members have varied sexual and musical tastes, songs have different tempos, cover a wide range of genres, to appeal to ever fetish and fantasy.
Songs made the list because of their application to the focus of this website, others because of their lyrical content, and some because of the vibe they create. The songs strongest in all three elements form the top ten. Youtube will help you get familiar with the songs and lyrics you don’t know.
Top Ten (no particular order)
- Quincy Jones (with Al B Sure, El DeBarge, James Ingram and Barry White) - The Secret Garden
- Berlin – Sex (I’m A man) extended version
- LL Cool J – “Doin’ It”
- Protishead – Glory Box
- RAZE – Break 4 Love
- D’Angelo – Brown Sugar
- TLC – Red Light Special (Dirty Version)
- Love and Laughter – I Surrender
- Depeche Mode – Just Can’t get enough (extend version)
- D’Angelo – Cruisin (With all due respect to Smoke Robinson – this cover is better)
The Best of the Rest
George Michael - I want your Sex ; Lil Wayne – Lollipop; Herb Albert – Rise; Barry White – Never, Never Gonna Give Ya Up; Ravel – Bolero; Diana Ross – Love Hangover; Digital Underground – Freaks of the Industry; Vanity 6 – Nasty Girls (long version); Laid Back – White ; George Clinton – Atomic Dog; Frankie Goes to Hollywood – Relax; Chic – Le Freak (the “bodyguard” dance moves for this song, put it on the list); Radiohead - High and Dry; Soul II Soul Back to Life; Janet Jackson - That’s the Way Love Goes; Keith Sweat – Nobody; Groove Theory - Tell Me ; Garbage – Only Happy When it Rains; Sade – “Cherish the Day”; Ludacris – What’s Your Fantasy; Nena - 99Luft Balons; Salt-N-Pepa – Push It; Musique – In The Bush (Version Discotheque); R. Kelly – Bump and Grind; Cowboy Junkies – Sweet Jane; Blondie – One Way or Another; Isley Brothers – Between the Sheets; Chris Isaak – Wicked Game; Marvin Gaye – Lets get it on; James Brown – Sex Machine; Van Morrison – Into the Mystic; Jefferson Airplane - Somebody to Love; Mozart - Don Giovanni: Overture; Archive – You make Me Feel; Robert Goerl with Annie Lennox – Darling Don’t Leave Me; Puscier – Rev 22:20 Underworld; Robin Thicke – Dreamworld; Color Me Badd - I want to sex you up; Ginuwine – Pony; Jane Birkin & Serge Gainsbourg - Je T'Aime....Moi Non Plus; Roberta Flack with Donny Hathaway – The Closer I get to You
|
|
|
6
Comments
|
|
Sexual Attraction
|
Posted:Sep 23, 2013 10:07 am
Last Updated:Nov 28, 2015 2:40 pm
16894 Views
|
Have you ever wondered how sexual attraction works? What makes someone more sexually desirable than others? The more time I spend on VisionPersonals.com, the more fascinated I am with the subject. Most literature suggests its nature’s programming of our brains, the natural order to select and respond to stimuli that cater to our reproductive senses. Some say it is just a matter of visual stimulus, things like facial symmetry, the desired hip to waist ratio, the curve at the bottom of the butt and breasts on a woman, or the shoulder to waist ratio and alethic look of man that does it. Other writings have an entirely different list of factors, not all based on visual attractiveness. Although there isn’t complete agreement on the subject of which stimuli come into play, there does seem to be a consensus that it is a purely visceral reaction. Is it that simple, or is it more complex than that? Over my life, I have had the good fortune to meet several sets of attractive identical twins, and would always have a preference for one over the other immediately. I don’t think I am the only one this has happened to. This phenomenon has certainly been made light of in popular entertainment, like the TV show Friends, where Joey Tribbiani falls for Phoebe’s “evil” twin sister Ursula. If it’s all visceral and based on visual stimuli, shouldn’t the attraction to each of the twins be identical? So why do I, and it seems a lot of other people, have the seemly strange reaction.
I am inclined to believe that sexual attraction is not purely visceral. There are other factors in play, that can enhance or derail, how sexually desirable we find someone.
At university, I had a part time job at one of the campus bars. I ran into a co-ed from another school as I was leaving the bathroom. She was very attractive, looked a little sad, but had an undeniable sexual aura about her. I asked her, “what was the matter”? She responded “my lover doesn’t want me anymore”. I am not sure what I responded with, but after the exchange, she had moved in for a kiss, and I was more than happy to oblige. She was sexually aggressive, which I found a welcome change from the heavy lifting one had to do back in the day to get to shake the sheets (no VisionPersonals.com back then, or texting for a hookup). In less than 5 minutes, we had gone from total strangers to making arrangements to consummate our new friendship, when I finished work.
It was a top shelf evening, full of fun and magic for all; she had game. The following morning we decided there would be an encore performance that night, but the performance would be preceded by a date. We would meet back at the same bar. It was a big party weekend (homecoming), so I would get to combine all my favorite things in a great evening; I was so excited. The date was a huge mistake, my sexual partner was one dimensional in her ability to relate to me, and I think men in general, (I ran into her about 14 years later, and she was still complaining of her inability to hold onto a lover). She couldn’t seem to carry a conversation that wasn’t about sex, couldn’t have a good time, and was killing the buzz of a guy “who’s never met a party he didn’t like”. As the night wore on, she got the feeling that I was not enjoying her company in the current social setting, as much as I had enjoyed her company between the sheets, so she started to press, sexually. Over the next few hours, I was whispered graphic details about what I was in for that evening. Her inability to interact with me socially or intellectually and her continued barrage became tiresome, having the opposite effect of what she intended. Instead of turning me on, she was turning me off. Eventually I just wanted to get the hell away from her, and succeeded by the end of the night. So with in a 24 hour span, the sexual attraction I had felt was wiped out, by an inability to connect on other levels.
So if sexual attraction is indeed a visceral reaction to visual stimuli, what happened? None of the visual stimuli had changed in the 24 hour period, but somehow the sexual attraction got short circuited. And no, it wasn’t a hump and dump thing (a few readers may be thinking that), I am a big proponent of once is never enough (3, 4, 5 …10, maybe). We did get together a few weeks later, but the magic was gone.
I would like to get thoughts on what you feel triggers sexual attraction and what kills it.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (khuXBFXM8u) use [blog khuXBFXM8u] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
81
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Most Recent Comments by Others
| Behaviour (46) | sensualpassion72
May 20, 2016 1:46 pm |
| Political Correctness… (44) | tigger678902
Apr 25, 2016 2:59 pm |
| Feeling Insulted... (27) | humorlife
Apr 5, 2016 5:40 am |
| The Seventeenth Virtual Symposium – Her Name was Heather, she was 15… (37) | humorlife
Apr 5, 2016 5:09 am |
| Social Media (39) | BrownEyedBBW
Mar 8, 2016 12:32 pm |
| Yeah, I’m talking about you! (74) | love2pleasu13
Mar 4, 2016 10:39 am |
| The Sixteenth Virtual Symposium Freinds with Benefits (51) | BrownEyedBBW
Feb 7, 2016 2:43 pm |
| The Golden Rule… (38) | BrownEyedBBW
Feb 7, 2016 2:15 pm |
| Affluenza meet Karma (32) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:49 pm |
| What Do you Think? (33) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:44 pm |
| Progress (22) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:36 pm |
|
