Foreskin… misunderstood
|
Posted:Apr 8, 2014 12:56 pm
Last Updated:Apr 10, 2014 10:54 am
10813 Views
|
Sorry, this is a long follow-up post
I just did a post a few days ago about circumcision (male and female), and it brought out strong opinions on the subject matter. The result is not unexpected since female circumcision is a hot button issue the world over. I got the sense, some of my friends were outraged that I was brazen enough to compare male and female circumcisions. I compare the two because both are forms of genital mutilation, both are done to conform to social “norms”, within a given society and to present the ascetics that everyone else has. Sure there are reason (some medical), why people believe circumcision (for males anyway) is in the best interest of the person being circumcised; an argument that doesn’t hold water, when you consider what it purports to prevent in early childhood, unitary track infection, and that complication from circumcisions is higher than UTI occurs. What most, (not all) missed was my point of why the two are comparable; performance of an irreversible procedure that alters the enjoyment of sex, without the informed consent of the individual who undergoes the procedure.
Today I wanted to dig deeper into the foreskin, a piece of skin most seem to think is inconsequential when it comes to the enjoyment of sex. I think the view that removing the foreskin is not a great loss of sexual enjoyment for the man, and that most of the female circumcisions being performed is believe to be an effort to stop women from enjoying sex, is why they ladies were a little hot under the collar at my comparison.
I knew the foreskin contains nerve endings that are excited during play… I have the equipment, so I have always known this. I have become acutely aware of the concentration of nerves and blood vessels in the foreskin as I have investigated the similarities between the clitoris and penis. What I didn’t know until recently was the foreskin actually contains the most by number and the most sensitive nerve endings on any part of the penis. Now that I think of it, this makes perfect sense when you think of the similarities between the penis and clitoris; the foreskin is like the clitoral hood of a woman. If you have ever been licked there, then you understand the pleasure.
The penile skin system is an elaborate system of skin, blood vessels and nerve endings. The foreskin is actually a double-sided fold of skin and mucosal tissue, the most sensitive part is the inside of the foreskin. The foreskin actually provides 12 known functions. To cover and bond with synechia so as to permit the development of the mucosal surface of the glans and inner foreskin; to protect the infant’s glans from feces and ammonia in diapers; to protect the glans from friction and abrasion throughout life; to keep the glans moisturized and soft with emollient oils; to lubricate the glans; to coat the glans with a waxy protective substance; to provide sufficient skin to cover an erection by unfolding; to provide an aid to masturbation and foreplay; to sever as an aid to penetration; to reduce friction and chafing during intercourse; to serve as erogenous tissue because of its rich supply of erogenous receptors, and to contact and stimulate the G-spot of a female partner. During penetration, the foreskin will roll back and roll out with each thrust, exposing the most sensitive spots on a penis.
Back around 2006, researchers conducted a series of test to gage the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis, versus a circumcised penis. The findings were documented in an academic paper called the “Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis”; look it up if you are so inclined. The work tested the sensitivity of the penis along different portion of the penis. What they found was the most sensitive part of the penis is the foreskin, and with the typical circumcisions the most sensitive, and most erogenous section of the penile skin system are removed.
There are some accepted medical facts about our genitals and the similarities between men and women. If you have ever looked at the structure of the clitoris and the penis, the similarities jump out at you.
Male and female genitals develop from the same embryonic tissue and have the same corresponding parts.
When it’s all done, and we are born, the parts that start out identical become the parts we identify by these common names.
ovaries = testes
labia majora (outer lips) =scrotum
labia minora (inner lips) = underside of the penis
glans (head of clitoris) = glans (head of penis)
shaft (erectile tissue) of clitoris = shaft (erectile tissue) of penis)
vagina = no comparable structure in male.
Although the outward appearance of the cock and clit may be different in size, what it develops from, and the fact that the tissue type are the same, the fact that when sexually excited they both become bigger, does it not follow that the pleasure receptors are similar? Does it not follow that losing any part of it is a reduction in sexual pleasure? And as demonstrated by science, what is lost by male circumcision is most highly sensitive and responsive to touch portions of the erectile tissue. Is male circumcision equivalent to a type III or type II female circumcision? NO, because the gland is left intact on the male and no other parts are interfered with. But there is definitely a significant loss of pleasure receptors, and there is no secondary pleasure center, since there is no structure comparable to a vagina on a man.
Through ignorance, arrogance and the obsession with stopping masturbation, some physicians thought that by performing circumcisions on both sexes in would stop masturbation. Circumcisions then just took on a life of its own. In 1891 Peter Charles Remondino advocated circumcision to prevent or to cure a number of afflictions, including alcoholism, epilepsy, asthma, headaches and a bunch of others. Female circumcision quickly fell out of vogue in English speaking countries, but not so for the men. Even as medical research demonstrated that circumcision was not a cure all, new rationales were adopted to validate the practice. By the early 20th century circumcision was being advocated as a hygienic measure. Even though criticism of the practice was mounting, it still continued to grow. Almost 40 years ago (1975), the American Academy of Pediatrics came out in opposition of the practice of circumcision, arguing that good personal hygiene would provide all the advantages of routine circumcision without the risk associated with surgery. Even after that, it wasn’t until the 1990’s that routine circumcision stopped being recommended. Even now red herrings keep being introduced to legitimize continuing the practice. Now it seems it is mostly done as a religious right, or because it is seen as “normal”, so that a baby boy can look the same as his father, brother, the men in porn, what have you.
There were some strong feelings as a result of the first post, and some of you will just say this guy (khu), is just whack! If you feel what I am saying doesn’t hold water prove me wrong. Do the work, read the history and the research work on this topic, get the facts about the similarities between the clitoris and the penis, and don’t just shoot from the hip and hang on to long held believes. It is the challenge that we all face (to enlighten one another with facts and reason), and collectively all fail miserably on this site. I point to the countless blogs written by women on this site, where what is discussed is the believe system of men who message you, and their behavior when they find out that VisionPersonals.com is not a free brothel. It’s difficult to unlearn what one has held as the truth, even when facts and logic slap you in the face.
Even with access to all the information at our finger tips, most of you will never investigate. A lot of the comments in the first post, echoed the sentiment, “an uncut cock is ugly, “it’s my personal preference that a cut cock looks better, and it’s normal”, “I am entitled to my opinion”; to all that I say you are correct, from your point of view. But somewhere in the world where they practice female circumcision, there is a little girl and her time has come, and there is also a person (“an outsider who doesn’t understand”), who is trying to change minds, saying you shouldn’t be doing this. There are males in these cultures who benefit from the practice, it’s their “normal”, they prefer the benefits and conveniences of a wife who has been circumcised. Although the enforcers of the traditions of female circumcisions are the mother and grandmothers, if enough males or the right males in that culture say, “I can’t in good conscience support the practice”, would the mother and grandmother’s be so eager to act, to make their “normal”? Kind of makes you think if your stated preference for aesthetics and ease of giving a blow job makes a detrimental practice hang around longer. When a young mother and father here in North American have to make a choice for their new born , will you and everyone like you have influenced their decision? Will your influence be positive or negative?
I read a profile on a vanilla site not too long ago that quoted Mahatma Gandhi… “You must be the change you want to see in the world.” So I will end this long ass post with another Mahatma Gandhi quote for you to contemplate… “As human beings, our greatness lies not so much in being able to remake the world – that is the myth of the atomic age – as in being able to remake ourselves.”
|
|
|
12
Comments
|
|
After you give him Oral
|
Posted:Apr 7, 2014 3:41 pm
Last Updated:Apr 9, 2014 11:49 am
9869 Views
|
If a man will not kiss you after you have given him oral and swallowed, does he deserve oral sex?
|
|
|
16
Comments
|
|
Circumcisions, yes or no…
|
Posted:Apr 5, 2014 6:06 am
Last Updated:Feb 4, 2016 6:39 pm
11720 Views
|
I think if I poled every lady on the site I would be hard pressed to find any who would defend the practice of female circumcisions. It is a cultural practice that most (if not all) women in the west, see as a barbaric third world practice, which must be stopped.
I do enjoy reading profiles, and the one thing that strikes me, is the percentage of women who insist their male play partner must be circumcised. Although the lost in sensitivity may not be to the same degree as female circumcision, why is this not seen as a barbaric practice that must be stopped with the same fervor. Are ladies who are against female circumcisions, who will only play with circumcised males hypocrites?
Your Thoughts
|
|
|
38
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
After Sex…
|
Posted:Apr 4, 2014 8:36 pm
Last Updated:Apr 9, 2014 5:22 am
10621 Views
|
What goes through your mind immediately after sex?
|
|
|
23
Comments
|
|
Labiaplasty, Vaginoplasty…
|
Posted:Apr 4, 2014 3:29 pm
Last Updated:Apr 14, 2014 6:42 am
10447 Views
|
Or the spin doctor term “Vaginal Rejuvenation Surgery”, is a plastic surgery procedure for altering the look of the Labia Minora, the Labia Majora and the Vagina. The procedures came about to help women deal with discomfort from underlying conditions, that may manifest itself as a result of aging, childbirth or other events. But now, the vast majority of procedures are done purely for aesthetic reasons alone.
Labiaplasty and Vaginoplasty is a controversial subject. Critics contend that the majority of women who decide to undergo this procedure have an “unhealthy self-image induced by their comparison of themselves to the prepubescent images of women they see in commercials or pornography. The argument seems to hold water. When I performed an oogle search on the topic, there was an ad for a Toronto area cosmetic clinic, so I had a look. They call their vaginal procedure (and it has been trademarked), “Designer Laser Vaginoplasty® (DLV®)”. The first sentence on the page read, “Although hidden, a woman's genitalia can still be a source of shame and discomfort when its appearance is less than favorable”. The list of procedures included, laser Labia reduction, Clitoral Hood reduction and Hymenoplasty. You are correct; Hymenoplasty restores the hymen to its pre-ruptured state (in less than half an hour), so you can relive that first time.
What do you think about all this?
|
|
|
20
Comments
|
|
The Spinoff Bands…
|
Posted:Apr 3, 2014 3:50 pm
Last Updated:Apr 7, 2014 11:46 am
10168 Views
|
It’s time to flex your musical muscle and name a spinoff band. Name as many as you can, starting the original band and the spinoff band that came out of it.
|
|
|
18
Comments
|
|
Breakup…
|
Posted:Apr 3, 2014 5:33 am
Last Updated:Apr 6, 2014 10:48 am
10718 Views
|
Sex; when it becomes time to move on, because… you have met someone new, something has changed in your life impeding the relationship, you are going vanilla… whatever your reason is, should you have break up sex?
If you are going to have breakup sex, should you have sex before or after you announce your intent?
|
|
|
23
Comments
|
|
Time to Go...
|
Posted:Apr 2, 2014 5:19 am
Last Updated:Apr 6, 2014 10:55 am
10005 Views
|
You just had some tremendous sex, a first encounter with a new partner. After you have had your fill and the post-coital cuddling is coming to an end, its decision time… Should I stay or should I go?
How do you delicately extricate yourself, or worse, how do you get them to leave when they are missing all your subtle hint to “get the fuck out”?
|
|
|
17
Comments
|
|
NSA, Fuckbuddy, is great sex possible?
|
Posted:Apr 1, 2014 7:26 am
Last Updated:Jan 26, 2016 5:00 am
10339 Views
|
In my last post I wrote about research findings on what components needs to be in place to have great sex. The collective comments hit on the 8 components identified by the researchers. Many of the components can easily manifest itself in any sexual relationship, other such as: connection, alignment, merger, being in sync; deep sexual and erotic intimacy; and extraordinary communication, heightened empathy, are much tougher if not impossible to develop in a NSA or fuckbuddy type relationship.
I would like to get your thoughts on if great mind-blowing sex is possible in an NSA or fuckbuddy situation; what are your experiences?
|
|
|
20
Comments
|
|
Great Sex to me is….
|
Posted:Mar 29, 2014 7:16 am
Last Updated:Jan 4, 2016 3:20 pm
11888 Views
|
I’m always trying to learn more about sex, so I can utilize the knowledge in my sexual life, now and into the future. Lots of talk shows, popular magazine advice columns, and we here, the members of Blogville, have weighed in on how to have better sex. The opinions put forth are wide and varied.
A Canadian research team headed by Dr. Peggy Klienplatz analyzed a wide assortment of popular sources, and found the advice typically penned on how to have great sex focused on two things; improving technique, and variety (sex positions, location and occasionally partners). Dr. Klienplatz decided to take a scientific approach, and recruited a sexually experienced and diverse group of people. The group included participants of different genders, age, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and 20 certified sex therapists. Dr. Klienplatz and her team interviewed each participant about their definitions of, and experiences with great sex. The researchers poured over the data, and their findings were interesting, and didn’t reflect the way “great sex” is typically written about. They found that great sex didn’t come from titillating toys, limber limbs, or tricky tongues. It didn’t depend on orgasms per minute, positions per hour, locations, or the number of partners. Her findings revealed that great sex could be distilled done to eight components.
There is a lot of collective sexual intellect here in Blogville, I would like to see if collectively, we can hit on all the things this research team found. I would like to get your feeling on what great sex is … please no oogling for the research, just say what you feel, whether it is one word, one line, a few sentences or something lengthy, describe great sex to me.
Great sexy to me it…
|
|
|
27
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
PooPourri
|
Posted:Mar 28, 2014 4:30 am
Last Updated:Mar 30, 2014 4:32 am
10044 Views
|
Laughing my ass off; I was just listening to some music videos over at U-tube, and a commercial for PooPourri comes on. If you don’t know what this is, just throw a dot com after the title of this post and watch the product commercial. I just love the commercial; a sexy little enchantress, with a posh British accent and great command of the English language. Is there anything sexier than a well dress, well-spoken woman, with an accent?
Have you tried this shit?  Does it work? And if you haven’t would you?
|
|
|
14
Comments
|
|
Classic Funk
|
Posted:Mar 27, 2014 3:14 pm
Last Updated:Apr 4, 2014 8:53 pm
10089 Views
|
Ok this post could crash and burn, or be tons of fun.
Every so often I like to work my way down the list of the top bloggers I don’t follow regularly, just to see if something peaks my interest. I dropped by [blog ladytatas], and she had posted a video. What struck me right away, (other than the obvious), and gave me a giggle fest was the back ground music to her video, Flashlight by Parliament Funkadelic. If you watch the video you will understand why I was giggling.  Looking at Ladytatas’ age, I’m kind of surprised she knew this track, since she would have been 5 when it came out. It’s not like classic funk got a lot of air time, back in the day or now.
Anyway, I wanted to see if Blogville can dazzle me with your knowledge of old time classic funk. So post a comment with the song and artist if you know one. I’m thinking of one particular song that is most appropriate for VisionPersonals.com, there is a word that is associated with sex, that is in the title of the song, and the dance that went with the song. Bonus marks if you post it first.
Now, I lay me down to sleep… Ooh, I just can't find a beat… Flash light... (Ohh, I will never dance)... Flash light... Flash light...
|
|
|
14
Comments
|
|
A question for Size Queens
|
Posted:Mar 26, 2014 4:12 pm
Last Updated:Apr 1, 2014 7:34 am
11916 Views
|
You know who you are, how do you measure the member? In your profiles, many of you generalize your wants, “prefer well endowed”; but is there an actual measurement you are looking for? Some of you get very specific, 8”+ and thick, but what is thick to you more than 5.1” in circumference or more than 6”. How do you measure; do you carry a tailor’s tape measure in your back pocket, use the distance between your thumb and pinky or some other method, or the circle made by your thumb and middle finger? I was reading a friends blog, who puts a premium on size; she uses the pubic bone test… jam your mouth onto a man’s member, and take as much of him as you can. If the lips don’t meet the pelvis, all is good. 
The aforementioned methods may be practical for an erect penis, which means some up close and personal contact; what happens if it doesn’t measure up, are you walking? At that point after the man is hard and you have handled his member, isn’t it kind of an awkward situation? And then there is the whole before the member is hard situation. A flaccid penis is a poor estimator of erect length and girth; some barely grown some can grow to 3.5 times their original size. Certainly if you are going to walk, due to disappointing size, it would be best to do it then, before you started handling the member, right?
So ladies, how do you sort this all out? 
|
|
|
28
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
To link to this blog (khuXBFXM8u) use [blog khuXBFXM8u] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
81
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Most Recent Comments by Others
| Behaviour (46) | sensualpassion72
May 20, 2016 1:46 pm |
| Political Correctness… (44) | tigger678902
Apr 25, 2016 2:59 pm |
| Feeling Insulted... (27) | humorlife
Apr 5, 2016 5:40 am |
| The Seventeenth Virtual Symposium – Her Name was Heather, she was 15… (37) | humorlife
Apr 5, 2016 5:09 am |
| Social Media (39) | BrownEyedBBW
Mar 8, 2016 12:32 pm |
| Yeah, I’m talking about you! (74) | love2pleasu13
Mar 4, 2016 10:39 am |
| The Sixteenth Virtual Symposium Freinds with Benefits (51) | BrownEyedBBW
Feb 7, 2016 2:43 pm |
| The Golden Rule… (38) | BrownEyedBBW
Feb 7, 2016 2:15 pm |
| Affluenza meet Karma (32) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:49 pm |
| What Do you Think? (33) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:44 pm |
| Progress (22) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:36 pm |
|
