Smells like BBQ…
|
Posted:May 29, 2014 3:43 pm
Last Updated:Jun 2, 2014 6:53 pm
15065 Views
|
I just finished dinner, and sat down to read some blogs; it’s a beautiful seasonal day, so I have the windows open and in wafts the smell of BBQ. It’s killing me! I love the smell that comes from BBQ sauce when it is being brushed on meat, chicken or pork.  I wonder if the neighbors would mind if I just pop over there and helped myself.
Does this happen to anyone else… you just finished eating so you’re not hungry anymore, then you smell something delicious, and you just start craving it?
What food does it for you, gives you that mouth orgasm?
|
|
|
26
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
Myths we need to stop teaching females about sex
|
Posted:May 29, 2014 2:03 pm
Last Updated:Jun 2, 2014 5:00 am
13053 Views
|
As I mentioned in my prior post, here is a list of 17 myths feed to the ladies. I’d like your take on the accuracy of the list, i.e. have any myth’s been missed, or are there things on the list you feel are not myths.
1. Virginity exists.
2. Hymens are a sign of virginity.
3. All women are born with vaginas (Gender identity is different from biological sex).
4. The first time is going to hurt — a lot.
5. If someone buys you something, you owe him or her sex.
6. Too much sex will stretch you out.
7. Women don't think about sex very much.
8. Women don’t like casual sex.
9. Boys buy the condoms.
10. "Frigid" wives make cheating husbands.
11. You have to wax.
12. You can't have sex on your period.
13. Sex is supposed to hurt sometimes.
14. Once you start having sex, you're not allowed to say "stop."
15. Women don’t watch porn.
16. Sexual harassment is normal.
17. Everybody's doing it.
Your thoughts please
|
|
|
12
Comments
|
|
Myths we need to stop teaching males about sex
|
Posted:May 29, 2014 1:43 pm
Last Updated:Jun 2, 2014 4:50 am
13085 Views
|
I came across an article outlining 16 lies we need to stop feeding boys (and men) about how “real men” have sex. There was also a separate article about myths fed to females; I will put in a separate post. I wanted to get your take on the accuracy of the list, i.e. have any myth’s been missed, or are there things on the list you feel are not myths.
1. A big penis is the only way to ever please a lover.
2. Sex lasts for at least an hour.
3. Men always want sex.
4. Sex ends with a man's orgasm.
5. What you see in porn is what happens during sex.
6. Men should always initiate sex.
7. Circumcised penises are the right kind.
8. Men are in charge of buying condoms.
9. All men are born with penises (Gender identity is different from biological sex).
10. Everyone around you is having sex.
11. Liking butt play makes you gay.
12. Going down on someone isn't masculine.
13. Men can't get some kinds of STDs.
14. If you buy someone dinner, you're getting laid.
15. When men can't get erections, it means they don't want sex.
16. Men think about sex every seven seconds.
Your thoughts please
|
|
|
16
Comments
|
|
Hoaxes…
|
Posted:May 28, 2014 9:02 am
Last Updated:May 29, 2014 9:31 am
13213 Views
|
something intended to deceive or defraud, or perhaps just some harmless fun.
A “citizen journalism” article on CNN went viral and stayed viral for 24 hours. The article had more than 200,000 views and had 22,000 social media shares. What caused all the hub-bub? Well here is an excerpt:
"Scientists believe that during a close encounter with Mars, the asteroid was nudged slightly off its usual orbit and may currently be on a high speed collision course with our fragile planet.
"The asteroid is calculated to have a potentially lethal encounter with the Earth on March 35, 2041."
Now, unless you are someone who is prone to freak out first, and then analyze things later, something should jump out at you… March 35th. But it took a statement from NASA to crush this thing… Ah, the awesome power of social media, on those who live and die by this social phenomenon.
For a hoax to be successful, it must be believable… you know play on the fears, hopes, and gullibility (some would say stupidity) of the marks.
My question you people of the Ville, what should be done to the perpetrator of this hoax?
I will reveal how I would handle this situation, tomorrow in my post about my same sex tryst with Vladimir Putin.
|
|
|
18
Comments
|
|
The Beginning
|
Posted:May 27, 2014 2:12 pm
Last Updated:Jun 2, 2014 6:51 pm
14215 Views
|
I have always believed (whether we are talking about acquaintances, friends, fuckbuddies, FWB or life-long partners) your relationship with someone begins the moment you meet, even if there is no initial interest or spark. Each good time, bad time or so-so time, is just part of the journey. Enjoy now, not thoughts of the future.
Your thoughts
|
|
|
19
Comments
|
|
|
|
Love Removal Machine
|
Posted:May 21, 2014 8:26 pm
Last Updated:May 26, 2014 6:46 am
13818 Views
|
Blog friend bonerdonor4’s post [post 3407394], got me thinking about rock music I enjoyed in my youth and now. Before, heading out for the evening, we would gather at someone’s place (who ever lived closer to where we would be partying), for a “pre-gamer”. It’s something that has survived to this date, when a large group of us get together, such as our annual golf tournament, it still goes on unchanged. Part of the ritual was always some pump-up music, which would be played as loud as we could take it, to set the mood. A few memorable tracks were “Word up” by Cameo, and L.A. Woman by the doors. If any of my readers attended Miami University (Miami of Ohio) in the late 80’s, and have heard about an incident with “the Canadians” at CJ’s, after the football team won the MAC title and clinched a Bowl appearance  L.A. Woman was playing as we drove into Oxford, and a few other times that weekend. But, I digress.
Another pump-up music selection included a double shot of the British band The Cult. The two tracks were “Wildflower” and “Love Removal Machine”. Love Removal Machine has an interesting story to it, it was actually influenced by some events that happened not far from where I live and grew up, and I pass the general location, with regularity. Before I tell you all about it, here are the words to the song… but really you should Utube it, and play it loud for full effect.
Check this one
Fell to the red room because she was there, uh-huh-huh-huh
A scarlet woman, she got me in fear, yeah, yeah, yeah
She said, do all those things that you do to me
You know what I mean, boy
Do all those things that you do to me, yeah
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love, soul shaker
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover machine
Baby, baby, baby, baby, baby, I fell from the sky
Yesterday, you blew my mind, oh yeah
Having trouble with my direction
Upside-down, psychotic reaction, oh
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover
(Talkin' bout love)
Love removal machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love, soul stealer
(Talkin' bout love)
Love removal machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love, fun remover
(Talkin' bout love)
Love removal machine
Yeah
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love, fun remover
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love
(Talkin' bout love)
Love remover machine
(Talkin' bout love)
Gimme love, soul shaker
(Talkin' bout love)
Love removal machine
Ooh yeah
Look out, here she comes
Look out, here she comes
I said, look out, here she comes
Look out, here she comes, yeah
Shake it, don't break it, baby
Shake it, don't break it, baby
Shake it, don't break it, baby
Shake it, don't break it
Baby
Ow, ow, ow
Ow, ow, ow
Ah, yeah
For most of his teenage years the lead singer of the group, Ian Astbury, lived in Hamilton, Ontario Canada. He is the songwriter for the group, and his experience while he was a Hamilton resident, gave rise to the song. About ½ hour southwest of Hamilton is a fair size (for this part of the world), Reservation that Ian use to frequent. On one occasion just off the Six Nations Reservation, Ian Astbury was attending a gentleman stag. Also in attendance was a “”, who was allegedly well past her prime. The “” was well… judiciously working; turning tricks in plain view. The stag was one of Ian Astbury’s early sexual experience and the inspiration for the song “Love Removal Machine”. “Shake it, don’t break it, baby” were meaningful, do you think.
Have you ever wondered, about the stories behind a song’s lyrics? Do you have any you would like to share?
|
|
|
8
Comments
|
|
On a Long Weekend...
|
Posted:May 18, 2014 7:16 am
Last Updated:May 21, 2014 8:21 pm
15399 Views
|
I absolutely intend on being up to no good. 
How about you?
|
|
|
22
Comments
|
|
KY’s Sexercise Program
|
Posted:May 15, 2014 1:34 pm
Last Updated:May 20, 2014 4:47 am
15457 Views
|
I was just reading on another site that KY, the sex lubricant brand, has allegedly been involved in some adventure to develop a sexercise program. Apparently a group consisting of sexologists, personal trainers and pornstars were brought together to develop a killer sexercise program. The said sexercise program was supposedly offered in Buenos Ares, at a large gym complex with over 5,000 people taking the program, and a commercial was shot of the goings on to support the program launch. This is where things get a little weird.
The commercial has apparently never aired in Buenos Ares, or anywhere for that matter. It has not been uploaded to Utube, place on any sex sites like A.F.F., it has just gone poof. I did see the commercial on the website I saw the story on, and KY is briefly mentioned, but no product shot or anything like that appears in it. Speculation is that KY, either got cold feet and decided to shelve the project; the director just made the video to try and sell the idea to KY, or KY is just testing the waters by leaking the video, gauging public interest, before undertaking a massive global launch.
I remember some memorable global launches, like when Microsoft launched Windows 95. Here in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Microsoft hung a huge banner, half the height of the mile high CN tower as part of the hoopla.
Here is my question… let’s say this sexercise program is legit, and KY goes with a global launch. Your local giant sports complex is commandeered for the launch. The promoters hang giant banners all over the outside of the building, so there is no mistaking that anyone going in there will be doing some sexercising. The banner clearly indicates the event is sponsored by VisionPersonals.com for its members, and you have been invited. Do you:
A - Decline the invitation?
B – Accept, but enter the building wearing a hoodie, ball cap and sunglasses?
C – Do you walk in loud and proud, wearing your sexiest workout outfit?
D – Or do you walk in loud and proud, wearing your sexiest workout outfit, and bring a friend?
|
|
|
32
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
Chivalry dead? Only if you let it
|
Posted:May 14, 2014 10:43 am
Last Updated:May 20, 2014 4:33 am
16449 Views
|
Sorry this is a long post.
About a week ago, I read a post about how chivalry was dying a slow painful death. It’s not the first post I have come across in the blogs, discussing the romantic notion of chivalry… yes you heard me correctly, our notion of chivalry is a somewhat romanticized version of what it really was. You hear the word chivalry, and you are probably thinking of opening doors, pushing/pulling chairs in/out, men standing when a lady enters or leaves a room or a table, men standing to allow a lady to sit, men walking nearest the street when walking with a lady, or maybe you are thinking of Sir Walter Raleigh mythically laying his coat down before Queen Elizabeth I. These are all acts of chivalry, but chivalry is not a series of acts, but a concept that gave rise to these types of actions. Before I get into how we have romanticized chivalry, let’s discuss the original concept and its evolution.
The term chivalry has its origins in the French military, derived from chevalier (“horseman, knights”), soldier who served in Charlemagne’s heavy cavalry. It was conceived as an aristocratic warrior code, which involved gallantry, individual training, and above all, service to others. The original Knights Code of Chivalry was a moral and honorable system whereby knights were to protect the defenseless, such as widows, and the elderly. Knights were required to tell the truth, respect the honor of women and guard the honor of fellow knights. They were also to obey those in authority and to never refuse a challenge from an equal.
As things evolved, chivalry became democratized and move beyond a code for knights as portions of the code became romanticized particularly in literature. Chivalry became associated with valor, honor, courtesy, courtly love and generosity, giving rise to a new genre called the “courtesy book”, which became a guide to the behavior of “gentlemen”. The post-medieval gentlemanly code of respect for women (ladies) was very much tied to the status of the woman. Ladies were revered, placed on a pedestal, holier than holy, like the Virgin Mary, were as by contrast ordinary women were looked down upon, and at time viewed as a source of evil (the virgin / slut dichotomy). The complete romanticization of the continually evolving codes of conduct has seen only the idea of gentleness and graciousness to women become the only surviving element, and this element is completely tied to traditionally defined male / female roles. Long gone is the concept of service and protection to all. As traditional male female roles have evolved and the division between them have blurred, it has become more difficult for individuals who wish to be chivalrous to know what actions to take. Part of the problem is, over time actions have been taught and revered, and not the underlying principle of service and protection to all. Knighthood after all was a position of servitude. Knights were made, not born… originally you didn’t automatically achieve knighthood, because your father was one. There was no divine right of succession, like other positions of nobility.
We are firmly entrenched in the "ME" generation, it permeates every aspect of society. Everyone wants to be treated like our current concept of a monarch, were everyone is beneath them, and should bow down in servitude to them; kind of a "don't you know who I am" attitude. While all are in tune with the concept of a monarchy, that subjects are in servitude to the monarch, most (including past and current monarchs) forgot the flipside of that symbiotic relationship. The flip side being that the monarchs are the ultimate servants… they are in servitude to all the subjects. Ultimately, that's why the monarchy system failed; the rulers focus on servicing themselves instead of serving who they were supposed to be serving. Over time everyone followed their example, and chivalry, the idea of service and protection to all has been replace by “me first”. If all positions of leadership were truly earned, instead of conferred on individuals as a birthright, the world would be a very different place. But I digress.
The idea of chivalry dies only if you let it. So I’m calling you all out, gentlemen and especially you ladies, because it’s time you stepped up, and truly demonstrated your equality. If the genders are to be truly equal, acts of chivalry are not just something that men should do for women, but women should do for other women, men for other men, and yes women for men. It's the basics folks; the please and thank you, and the granddaddy of them all, "do onto others as you would have them do onto you".
Here is a social experiment for you. For the next week, month, however long you want to go, be courteous and of service to others… hold doors open for everyone you meet and graciously thank anyone who holds a door open for you; give up your seat; when you are in traffic let that car cut in front of you, be sure to give a courtesy wave to anyone who lets you cut in front of them, even if they did so grudgingly. Do anything along those lines, and let me know how you make out… I think you will be surprised.
|
|
|
36
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
|
|
Hair…
|
Posted:May 9, 2014 11:20 am
Last Updated:Jun 19, 2014 5:48 am
19096 Views
|
How important is it? I don’t have much; I keep it usually very short or bald. I first shaved my head in high school on a lunch time dare, and realized it’s not that important for my looks. Now that I’m older, having little to no hair actually makes me look younger; with longer hair you can see the gray creeping in.
For most women, hair is very much tied to feelings of beauty and sex appeal. There is even the term “bad hair day”, to describe when you feel your hair is not doing it for you. I mean you never hear the term, “bad make up day”, to cover off mishaps with that daily beautifying routine.
Have a look at the two pictures below… both are of actress Elizabeth Montgomery from the mid 60’s to early 70’s show Bewitched, in her roles as Samantha and Serena, respectively.
Samantha
Serena
How much does the change in her hair influence your feeling towards her?
Is she more attractive to you in one picture over the other? Which one?
Is she sexier in one picture over the other? Which one?
Does she look naughtier or kinkier in one? Which one?
If you could have a sexual relationship with one of the personas (Samantha or Serena), which one would you choose and why?
|
|
|
39
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
The Perfect Partner
|
Posted:May 8, 2014 6:18 am
Last Updated:May 12, 2014 5:07 am
16309 Views
|
I just read a post by another blogger where he attempts to describe his perfect woman, and the first 4 things on his list are their physical characteristics. I pondered what my perfect woman would look like and I can’t, I can’t picture them in my head.
I thought of my blog crushes, different heights, body compositions, hair colors, there is no pattern to the physical characteristics. Their look, just works for me; it’s the same with local non-bloggers I see on the home page when I log in, and women in the real world. Am I weird, or are a few of you like me.
Do you have a clear picture in your head of what your perfect partner would look like? Describe them to me.
|
|
|
32
Comments
(Page:)
|
|
To link to this blog (khuXBFXM8u) use [blog khuXBFXM8u] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
81
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Most Recent Comments by Others
| Behaviour (46) | sensualpassion72
May 20, 2016 1:46 pm |
| Political Correctness… (44) | tigger678902
Apr 25, 2016 2:59 pm |
| Feeling Insulted... (27) | humorlife
Apr 5, 2016 5:40 am |
| The Seventeenth Virtual Symposium – Her Name was Heather, she was 15… (37) | humorlife
Apr 5, 2016 5:09 am |
| Social Media (39) | BrownEyedBBW
Mar 8, 2016 12:32 pm |
| Yeah, I’m talking about you! (74) | love2pleasu13
Mar 4, 2016 10:39 am |
| The Sixteenth Virtual Symposium Freinds with Benefits (51) | BrownEyedBBW
Feb 7, 2016 2:43 pm |
| The Golden Rule… (38) | BrownEyedBBW
Feb 7, 2016 2:15 pm |
| Affluenza meet Karma (32) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:49 pm |
| What Do you Think? (33) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:44 pm |
| Progress (22) | nicelipss66
Feb 3, 2016 9:36 pm |
|
